Blanes (Catalonia, Spain), September 4TH 2025
More than twenty years after the first detection of the tiger mosquito in Spain, a study published in the journal Insects presents for the first time a map of the distribution of three invasive species at the municipal level in the country. The work, which compiles two decades of surveillance and involved more than 40 authors, reveals that 1,813 of Spain’s 8,132 municipalities have already been colonized by one of these species.
This municipal distribution map has been made possible thanks to the collaboration of the scientific community, 33 academic institutions and public health agencies, as well as data contributed by citizens through the Mosquito Alert platform.
Twenty years of data and a pioneer hybrid model
The study analyses the expansion of three invasive species: the tiger mosquito, the yellow fever mosquito, and the Japanese mosquito (Aedes albopictus, Aedes aegypti, and Aedes japonicus, respectively) between 2004 and 2024. Led by Roger Eritja, Entomology and Data Validation Lead at Mosquito Alert and researcher at the Center for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), and Frederic Bartumeus, co-director of Mosquito Alert, it brings together 42 specialists from 33 scientific and public health institutions, including the Ministry of Health (see annex).
The novelty of this map lies in the integration of multiple sources of information. On the one hand, it includes data obtained over 20 years of field surveillance through egg, larva, and adult sampling, carried out by the study’s authors, the regional governments, and the Ministry of Health. On the other hand, citizen contributions, 110,939 observations submitted by 33,183 people using the Mosquito Alert app, where mosquito photos are classified by a system that combines the speed of artificial intelligence with the accuracy of experts.
A model with remarkable results
In numbers, the study shows that over 20 years, invasive mosquitoes (Aedes albopictus, Aedes aegypti, Aedes japonicus) have been detected in 1,813 Spanish municipalities (22% of the total). The tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus) is the most widespread and is present in 1,768 municipalities, including the most populated in the country, which means that two out of three people (66.2%) live exposed to its bites.
Map 1. Detections of Ae. albopictus by any strategy, broken down by year of first detection. Darker shades indicate earlier detections, from 2004 to 2024
Map 2. Map of Spanish municipalities with reported detections during the period 2004–2024
As for the Japanese mosquito, discovered by Mosquito Alert in 2018, it has been detected in 111 municipalities in northern Spain, in 68 of which it co-occurs with the tiger. The yellow fever mosquito is, for now, restricted to introductions in the Canary Islands.
The project’s authors highlight that (since the last compilation in 2015) this is the first municipal-scale map to include citizen participation, which has contributed to one-third of detections in the country. Specifically, 24.6% of detections since 2014, and up to 31.8% when counting simultaneous findings with field sampling. Citizen science has enabled early detection of presence in 7 regions, including Andalusia, Galicia, Aragon, both Castiles, Cantabria, and Melilla. Data reveal that colonization first occurred in densely populated areas along the Mediterranean coast, later spreading inland.
Roger Eritja, first author of the study and CEAB-CSIC researcher, emphasizes that “field entomological surveillance is irreplaceable and can benefit from synergies with new technologies and strategies based on social cooperation. While field surveillance offers high accuracy, citizen science provides an early warning system with real-time, large-scale, low-cost data collection.”
Isis Sanpera, author of the study, member of Mosquito Alert, and researcher at Pompeu Fabra University, adds that “this hybrid and cooperative model is particularly useful to detect dispersal events beyond the known expansion front of the species.”
A global threat, a collective response
Mosquito Alert’s citizen science has established itself as a public health tool, being integrated into the National Plan for the Prevention, Surveillance, and Control of Vector-Borne Diseases by the Ministry of Health in 2023. This integration positions Spain as a pioneer in Europe in integrating citizen participation into official surveillance systems.
The combination of citizen science and professional sampling helps save costs, speed up early warnings, and strengthen outbreak prevention. This integrated approach provides a pioneering model of surveillance that is cost-effective, scalable, and adapted to the dynamics of invasive species and emerging epidemiological threats. “The challenge is to maintain citizen participation and involvement in the long term,” notes Sanpera, highlighting the importance of communication and collaboration between institutions and society.
Citizens can continue to support surveillance and research through Mosquito Alert by sending mosquito observations, thereby contributing to the work of the scientific community and health authorities in protecting public health.
Article reference: Eritja, R., Sanpera-Calbet, I., Delacour-Estrella, S., Ruiz-Arrondo, I., Puig, M.À., et al. (2025). Integrating citizen science and field sampling into next-generation early warning systems for vector surveillance: Twenty years of municipal detections of Aedes invasive mosquito species in Spain. Insects, 16(x). https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/16/9/904
Mosquito Alert Communication
972 336 101 – 617937110
www.mosquitoalert.com
Annex
List of authors and affiliations
Roger Eritja, 1*; Isis Sanpera-Calbet 2; Sarah Delacour-Estrella 3; Ignacio Ruiz-Arrondo 3,4; Maria Àngels Puig 1; Mikel Bengoa-Paulís 5; Pedro María Alarcón-Elbal 6; Carlos Barceló 7; Simone Mariani 1; Yasmina Martínez-Barciela 8; Daniel Bravo-Barriga 9; Alejandro Polina 8; José Manuel Pereira-Martínez 10; Mikel Alexander González 11,12; Santi Escartin1, Rosario Melero-Alcíbar 13; Laura Blanco-Sierra 1; Sergio Magallanes 12,14; Francisco Collantes 15; Martina Ferraguti 12,14, 9; María Isabel González-Pérez 1; Rafael Gutiérrez-López 16,1;, María Isabel Silva-Torres 18; Olatz San Sebastián-Mendoza 1; María Cruz Calvo-Reyes 19; Marian Mendoza-García 20; David Macías-Magro 21; Pilar Cisneros 22; Aitor Cevidanes 23; Eva Frontera 24; Inés Mato 25; Fernando Fúster-Lorán 26; Miguel Domench-Guembe 27; María Elena Rodríguez-Regadera 28; Ricard Casanovas-Urgell 29; Tomás Montalvo 14,30; Miguel Ángel Miranda 7,31; Jordi Figuerola 12,14; Javier Lucientes-Curdi 3, 13; Joan Garriga 1; John Rossman Bertholf Palmer 2 & Frederic Bartumeus 1,32,33.
1 Centre d’Estudis Avançats de Blanes, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CEAB-CSIC)
2 Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Departament de Ciències Polítiques i Socials
3 Departamento de Patología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria. Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón-IA2 (Universidad de Zaragoza)
4 Center for Rickettsiosis and Arthropod-Borne Diseases, Hospital Universitario San Pedro-CIBIR
5 Anticimex España
6 Department of Animal Production and Health, Public Veterinary Health and Food Science and Technology, 22 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities
7 Grupo Zoología Aplicada y de la Conservación, Universitat de les Illes Balears
8 Departamento de Ecoloxía e Bioloxía Animal, Facultade de Bioloxía, Universidade de Vigo
9 Departamento de Sanidad Animal (Parasitología y Enfermedades Parasitarias), Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Córdoba (UCO)
10 Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC)
11 ATHISA Medio Ambiente (Grupo SASTI)
12 Departamento de Biología de la Conservación y Cambio Global, Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD), CSIC
13 Servicio Madrileño de Salud (SERMAS)
14 Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)
15 Departamento de Zoología y Antropología Física, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Murcia
16 Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III
17 Consorcio de investigación biomédica de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC) 35
18 EZSA Sanidad Ambiental (Grupo SASTI)
19 Centro de Coordinación de Alertas y Emergencias Sanitarias (CCAES). Dirección General de Salud Pública 37 y Equidad en Salud, Ministerio de Sanidad, Gobierno de España
20 Subdirección General de Sanidad Ambiental y Salud Laboral, Dirección General de Salud Pública y Equidad 39 en Salud, Ministerio de Sanidad, Gobierno de España
21 Servicio de Salud Ambiental, Dirección General de Salud Pública y Ordenación Farmacéutica, Consejería de 41 Salud y Consumo de Andalucía.
22 Sección de Zoonosis, Dirección General de Salud Pública, Gobierno de Aragón
23 Departamento de Sanidad Animal, NEIKER Instituto Vasco de investigación y desarrollo agrario. Basque 44 Research & Technology Alliance (BRTA)
24 Departamento de Sanidad Animal (Parasitología), Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Extremadura
25 Dirección General de Salud Pública, Consellería de Sanidad, Xunta de Galicia
26 Área de Vigilancia de Riesgos Ambientales en Salud, Consejería de Sanidad, Comunidad de Madrid
27 Instituto de Salud Pública y Laboral de Navarra (ISPLN)
28 Servicio de Salud Ambiental y Nutrición, Dirección General de Salud Pública, Consumo y Cuidados, 50 Consejería de Salud y Políticas Sociales, Gobierno de La Rioja
29 Servei de Fauna i Flora, Subdirecció General de Biodiversitat i Medi Natural, Direcció General de Polítiques Ambientals i Medi Natural, Departament de Territori, Habitatge i Transició Ecològica, Generalitat de Catalunya
30 Servei de Vigilància i Control de Plagues Urbanes, Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona
31 Instituto de Estudios Ambientales y Economía del agua, Universitat de les Illes Balears
32 Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA)
33 Centre de Recerca Ecològica i Aplicacions Forestals (CREAF)
